classes ::: Agenda_Vol_08, The_Mother, Satprem, Integral_Yoga, chapter,
children :::
branches :::
see also :::

Instances, Classes, See Also, Object in Names
Definitions, . Quotes . - . Chapters .


object:1967-09-20
book class:Agenda Vol 08
author class:The Mother
author class:Satprem
subject class:Integral Yoga
class:chapter


1967 Wed 20 September
September 20, 1967

Someone has taken it into his head to print a brochure for February 21 next year (when Mother will be ninety), so they sent me the brochure and asked me to write a message on the first page. And for that brochure they have solicited(!) the opinion of all prominent people: there is Indira Gandhi, the President of India, and what have you. And everyone says what has always been said millions of times over: “A great personality, this and that….” All the usual nonsense. So I wrote this:

There is no other consciousness than the Supreme Consciousness.
There is no other will than the Supreme Will.
There is no other life than the Supreme Life.
There is no other personality than the Supreme Personality, the One and the All.

All the usual platitudes all over again!

I thought it would teach them a lesson.
***

Soon afterwards

I had many things to say, but now I don’t remember.

Only an observation, which is really very interesting: it’s that everyone has said the same thing, all those who have had the Experience have said the same thing … but each one in his own way, so it looks like something different. Yesterday it was so clear, and again the whole morning, from early morning: this way, that way, this one here, that one there (Mother shows different facets), the philosophers, founders of religions, sages of all countries—they have always said the same thing. For instance, the Buddha’s teaching and, say, the Christian teaching, seem to be so different, but it’s always the same thing. That is to say, there is ONE state (if you catch hold of it), ONE state in which you are conscious of the divine Consciousness (not “conscious of”: “conscious through” or “conscious with,” I don’t know how to explain … it’s the divine Consciousness which is conscious, that is, the Consciousness in its essence), and there are no more problems there, no more complications, no more explanations, nothing anymore—everything is as clear as can be. So then, each one has tried to explain that, and naturally it has become confused, incomplete, incorrect, with one explanation clashing with another—while everyone is talking about the same thing!

It came yesterday in relation to a boy who sent me the letter from one of his friends, in which he said the usual nonsense: “I don’t believe in God because I can’t see him.” The usual little stupidity. And in that connection, I saw (I looked, like that, looked for a long time), I saw that the one who rejects, the one who asserts, the one … all that, all of it is (how could I put it?) variations on the same theme, even when it appears to be saying the contrary.

Yesterday it was interesting, because the observation was the same for the materialists who feel that the only truth is a “concrete” truth, the truth that can, according to them, be seen or heard or touched…. And it’s the same thing, the same state—the same state reflected in different between mirrors. But the difference in mirrors is not an essential and radical difference, it’s only … (gesture showing facets in movement), yes, that’s what some have called the “play,” but it’s not even a play; I could almost say it’s a difference of position.

Everything you can say about it is nothing, it’s part of that enormous jibbering that tries to express the inexpressible “something.” But when you are IN it, it’s so clear, so obvious—simple, without problems. And the world is no longer a problem.

Even that apparently rather fundamental difference between those who regard the Manifestation as divine and essential and those who consider that in order to reach the essential Divine you must leave the Manifestation (because it’s an “error”—that is, an error that took place in the Consciousness), even those two positions are the same thing! But how can you explain it? When you say that, it seems foolish, yet up above it’s true. It’s true—true and full. It’s full, not hollow—here everything rings hollow, so hollow; the hollowness of inadequacy. But up above…

It’s almost like a kaleidoscope: you turn it and get one picture, turn it again and get another picture, turn it again … yet it’s always the same thing!

But now, it’s the body that has the Experience. In a certain state, the state which corresponds to That, the essential state, everything is harmonious, with a living, smiling, happy peace; then as soon as there is … a nothing, you know, a mere trifle, simply the coming into the atmosphere of something conflicting—a mere nothing—it’s felt like something extremely acute and painful. But not in the way of the pain of Ignorance, it’s more like … you could call it an uneasiness, but it’s not even that…. Everyone has explained it in his own way: some have called it “falling from the Truth into Falsehood,” others “falling from the Light into Darkness,” others “falling from Ananda into suffering,” yet others … Everyone has given his explanation, but it’s something else…. As for me, I have no words for it, but the body feels it, feels it very acutely, and it sees that at the end of it, the consequence of it, is disintegration. And its whole effort is to strive to reestablish that inner harmony, that harmonic state in which everything becomes harmonious, everything—and in their appearance things haven’t changed! Yet in one way they are marvellous, and in the other detestable.

The opposition between the two things is becoming more pronounced every minute: one moment everything is divine, the next moment everything is detestable—yet it’s the same thing.

Since the 15th of August, since that experience at the balcony,1 it has become very clear.

But then, it has nothing to do with thought, or even with sensation: it’s purely material (Mother touches the skin of her hands), and it’s the difference between a progressive and unbroken harmony that has no reason to stop, which becomes more and more conscious, more and more harmonious, and also more and more … we say blissful, happy and all that—but it’s not that! It’s “something” … something SO NATURAL, so natural and… with the rhythm of eternity. So it is THAT, and then suddenly (gesture of reversal) you fall back into … exactly the SAME THING, everything is the same, yet everything is the opposite!

To such an extent that you have a perception, a material perception, inexpressible because it’s hardly mentalized, of a perfect Harmony which can, in the consciousness, turn into a serious illness! Things of that sort.

There is the vision, an extremely complex and at the same time complete vision, that those, for instance, who have tried to explain the power of imagination, of thought or will or faith (all those things: the direct action on matter), the vision that each of those things has caught hold of one little aspect of the Thing, but in the Thing, there are no divisions; it’s something which, when you perceive or conceive it, is divided into scores of little things, but it’s essentially … (how should I put it?) a way of being, a state of consciousness—it’s a WAY OF BEING, not even a “state of consciousness” because that implies “being conscious OF something” and it’s not that: it’s a way of being. And that way of being is what, in the human consciousness, expresses itself as “Ah, the Divine!”—by opposition, you understand. It’s a PERFECTLY NATURAL and spontaneous way of being—but how, how does That become this? How does That become distorted?… You constantly, constantly (gesture as of tiny reversals) switch from one to the other, back and forth, over and over again, as if to learn—to learn how That becomes this (the mechanism of the passage). To us it looks like (to us, to all this poor consciousness that has gone through innumerable woeful experiences), it looks like a “relapse” into the old state; therefore it’s not that. But what’s the mechanism?…

In the end, we would have the solution only if we found the how and the why.

Constantly, constantly … (same gesture of tiny reversals).

All the explanations people give are nothing but explanations. They are not THAT.

Knowing the why or the how probably implies the power to change everything….

In that case, it will come one day.

The "golden peace." ↩

***
September 16, 1967


questions, comments, suggestions/feedback, take-down requests, contribute, etc
contact me @ integralyogin@gmail.com or via the comments below
or join the integral discord server (chatrooms)
if the page you visited was empty, it may be noted and I will try to fill it out. cheers



--- OBJECT INSTANCES [0]


--- PRIMARY CLASS


chapter

--- SEE ALSO


--- SIMILAR TITLES [1]


1967-09-20
select ::: Being, God, injunctions, media, place, powers, subjects,
favorite ::: cwsa, everyday, grade, mcw, memcards (table), project, project 0001, Savitri, the Temple of Sages, three js, whiteboard,
temp ::: consecration, experiments, knowledge, meditation, psychometrics, remember, responsibility, temp, the Bad, the God object, the Good, the most important, the Ring, the source of inspirations, the Stack, the Tarot, the Word, top priority, whiteboard,

--- DICTIONARIES (in Dictionaries, in Quotes, in Chapters)



--- QUOTES [0 / 0 - 0 / 0] (in Dictionaries, in Quotes, in Chapters)



KEYS (10k)


NEW FULL DB (2.4M)


*** NEWFULLDB 2.4M ***


--- IN CHAPTERS (in Dictionaries, in Quotes, in Chapters)



0

   1 Integral Yoga






change font "color":
change "background-color":
change "font-family":
change "padding": 109363 site hits